OpenTweet ↗: an AI X post scheduler
- MRR
- $4,006 Verified 2026-10-21
- Total revenue
- $26,055
- Active subscriptions
- 236
Verified by TrustMRR
In one line: An AI tool that writes and schedules posts for X, sold as Pro, Advanced and Agency monthly plans with a card-required trial, paid through Paddle.
- Founder
- BrankoX ↗ · Solo
- Dates
- Launched Feb 10, 2026
Timeline
- Founded date listed on TrustMRR
- Founder says he built it for himself first
- Public launch on Uneed
- Revenue that month: $2,078 (TrustMRR)
- Adds MCP support so Claude can write, bulk-schedule and review posts
- Total revenue passes $20k (self-reported)
Compared with similar products
Sources: X post by @brankopetric00; X post by @brankopetric00; X post by @brankopetric00; TrustMRR: OpenTweet; TrustMRR: SuperX; TrustMRR: ClimbX.
TrustMRR figures are monthly revenue as shown on 2026-10-23 (read-only sync from the payment provider).
Moves OpenTweet made
No public information yet
How to copy it
Build a small tool you use daily yourself and get visible results with it
Pick something you do every day where existing tools feel overpriced or bloated, build a version with only the core features and use it yourself for a stretch, logging what you did with it and the result each day. What the founder did: he built a tool to stay consistent on X because existing tools were expensive and full of features he didn't need, and grew his following with it (self-reported, X post by @brankopetric00).Expand ▾Collapse ▴
Pick something you do every day where existing tools feel overpriced or bloated, build a version with only the core features and use it yourself for a stretch, logging what you did with it and the result each day. What the founder did: he built a tool to stay consistent on X because existing tools were expensive and full of features he didn't need, and grew his following with it (self-reported, X post by @brankopetric00 ↗).
- A tool you use daily and a daily log of what you did and the result.
- You've used it yourself for a stretch and the log shows results.
I do <the task> every day and existing tools are too expensive or bloated for me. Please: 1) list the core features I actually use daily, at most 3; 2) mark everything else as deferred; 3) write an implementation brief for an AI coding tool covering those 3 (screens, tables, scheduled jobs); 4) design a daily log for what I did with it and the result.
Step 1: build the first version for yourself (our recommendation; the founder did not say what he used).
Add AI drafting and agent access, and turn it into a sellable feature list
Add two things: an AI button that drafts in the user's voice, and an MCP interface so the user's AI agent can queue drafts. Then write a one-page feature and price list against two or three similar tools, marking where you're cheaper or built for individuals. What the founder did: he connected an AI agent to his tool via MCP to write in his style and schedule in bulk (X post by @brankopetric00), positioning it for creators rather than agencies (X post by @brankopetric00).Expand ▾Collapse ▴
Add two things: an AI button that drafts in the user's voice, and an MCP interface so the user's AI agent can queue drafts. Then write a one-page feature and price list against two or three similar tools, marking where you're cheaper or built for individuals. What the founder did: he connected an AI agent to his tool via MCP to write in his style and schedule in bulk (X post by @brankopetric00 ↗), positioning it for creators rather than agencies (X post by @brankopetric00 ↗).
- The AI draft button works; an AI agent can queue drafts via MCP; a one-page feature and price comparison.
- You queue a batch through an AI agent via MCP and it publishes on time.
My tool helps <your target users> with <the task>. Please: 1) write an LLM system prompt that takes the user's past content samples and drafts new pieces in their voice; 2) design an MCP server tool list (names, parameters, returns) letting an AI agent create and queue drafts, per the official MCP docs; 3) build a comparison table from the similar tools' features and prices I give, marking my differences. Material: <paste>
Step 2: one of the drafting models; the founder's launch post lists Claude, GPT-4o and Gemini built in.
Step 2: test an AI agent queuing posts over MCP; the founder says OpenClaw connects to OpenTweet via MCP.
Launch a subscription at a low starting price, list on directories and post on launch day
Open a subscription at a low starting price with payments connected, submit the product to directories, and on launch day post with screenshots where your target users gather. You set the price. What the founder did: he launched on Uneed with a very low starting monthly price (X post by @brankopetric00), taking payments through Paddle (TrustMRR).Expand ▾Collapse ▴
Open a subscription at a low starting price with payments connected, submit the product to directories, and on launch day post with screenshots where your target users gather. You set the price. What the founder did: he launched on Uneed with a very low starting monthly price (X post by @brankopetric00 ↗), taking payments through Paddle (TrustMRR ↗).
- The payment link works; the product is listed on at least one directory; the launch post is live.
- A stranger subscribes through the launch post or a directory.
My tool helps <your target users> with <the task>, starting at $<price>/month. Write: 1) an English one-liner, 3 features and who it's for, for directory listings; 2) an English launch-day post: why I built it, results with it (only my numbers), the link; 3) English copy for this tier on the pricing page. Numbers: <paste>
Step 3: collect subscriptions; TrustMRR verifies OpenTweet's revenue through the Paddle API.
Step 3: submit your launch; the founder launched OpenTweet on Uneed on 2026-02-10.
Share revenue progress publicly to attract users, then add one new channel at a time
Regularly post progress where your target users gather (revenue, paying customers, one lesson), add only one new channel at a time, and record each paying user's source with a signup field. What the founder did: growth came mainly from sharing progress on X, after which he tried SEO / AEO, other social media, DMs, email and Google Ads (X post by @brankopetric00).Expand ▾Collapse ▴
Regularly post progress where your target users gather (revenue, paying customers, one lesson), add only one new channel at a time, and record each paying user's source with a signup field. What the founder did: growth came mainly from sharing progress on X, after which he tried SEO / AEO, other social media, DMs, email and Google Ads (X post by @brankopetric00 ↗).
- Several progress posts are live; signup has a source field; a table of paying users by channel.
- The source table shows the new channel bringing paying users.
Below is my recent progress data: revenue, paying customers, new signups by source, and one lesson. Please: 1) write an English progress post using only my numbers; 2) from the source data, tell me which channel brings the most paying users and which to try next; 3) no invented numbers. Data: <paste>
Step 4: share revenue progress to drive signups; the founder's main channel is his own X posting.
Sources
- TrustMRR
- X: founder post, $3.7k MRR, 234 paid customers, more than his 9-5 salary (2026-09-26)
- X: founder post, $20,634 total revenue, $3,643 MRR (2026-09-13)
- X: founder Uneed launch post (7 AI models, $5.99/month, 2026-02-10)
- X: founder post, OpenClaw connected via MCP
- OpenTweet pricing page
- OpenTweet website
- trustmrr.com
- trustmrr.com
Next case
ClimbX: AI that drafts X posts in your voice
Business model: B2C SaaS subscription (drafts X posts in your voice, finds posts worth replying to, schedules posts): Base $29/month, Pro $39/month (the first 100 founding users lock in $29), Agency $199/month, with a 7-day free trial (card required) or $1 for 7 days (climbx.so pricing, 2026-10-19); paid through Stripe (the founder, replying on 2026-09-07 in a thread about ClimbX cancellations: "Yeah, using Stripe"); plus an affiliate program with 30% commission.
Data source: TrustMRR, checked 2026-10-22